Friday, November 02, 2007

Old Bayview Avenue bridge, summer 2007

I can't believe I've never written about this before on the blog. It's one of my favourite places for wandering and just poking around, but apparently I've always neglected to mention it. Well, a little background.

Toronto is a city of river valleys. Nothing huge, but ones substantial enough that they usually formed interruptions in the road network well into the 20th century, and in some places, still do (Leslie Street and St. Clair Avenue feature prominent discontinuities, for example). Things like that intrigue me... I suppose because they imply change; that one day, what seems impossible now might be bridged. When I lived in Mississauga, I was not far from huge bridges across the Credit River that hadn't even been built yet when I was born; bridges of major streets with names that people in Toronto would recognize like Eglinton and Burnhamthorpe. In Toronto itself, Steeles Avenue didn't cross the Humber until I was in high school; Finch Avenue didn't until I was an adult. Hard to believe now. So I've always enjoyed combing old maps for hints of places where bridges might have been lacking till recently, or better still, where older ones might exist or at least still be hinted at where newer ones have taken their place.

One such place, in spades, is Bayview Avenue over the West Don River. Anyone who has long lived in Toronto is familiar with this area; it's where Lawrence Avenue meets Bayview at a rather inconvenient intersection near York University's Glendon Campus. Heading north, you shoot across a huge, six-lane bridge that vaults from crest to crest as though the valley didn't exist at all. But it does, and until sometime around 1929, the crossing was nothing so grandiose or convenient...

Lawrence Avenue is, to this day, discontinuous at the West Don River underneath Bayview Avenue. The two roads meet only at the top, at Bayview's west side, south of the river. But pretty much hidden from view and the consciousness of most people, Lawrence Avenue actually does ease down into the valley below; in fact, it ends just a few yards short of the bridge itself, so high above it. The area is today largely fenced off, unfortunately. But it's here that Lawrence once had another meeting with Bayview Avenue, and the evidence of that is still there to be seen.

Till the much larger bridge was built, Bayview was a much more modest road, slipping, as Lawrence still does, down into the valley to meet the river at pretty much its own level. And where it did, the little one-lane concrete bridge that let traffic across still proudly, and even somewhat gracefully, spans the river. I'm not sure when it was built, but I'd guess sometime in the late 19th century. A photo of it, taken from just upstream, appears in a book I have about North York, undated except to suggest it was taken at the beginning of the 20th century.

Maps today still show a crossing there, and it was from such maps that I was first prompted, three or four years ago, to go have a look for myself. They also show a path between Lawrence Avenue and Glendon College up at the top of the valley. That's technically true; I've walked it; but there are places where you'd be forgiven for not knowing you were on a path if you hadn't arrived already knowing that. The original course of Bayview Avenue, it's been overgrown for decades, and nothing like a clear vehicle path still exists. But it's lovely. What the view up the road allowance must have looked like before it was crowned with modern-looking condominiums, I can only imagine.

As I said, I've been there several times, usually in the spring when the wanderlust to get out and look at natural anew is upon me; as often as not with friends. This year, though, I went back there in late August, and by myself. When I arrived at the end of Lawrence Avenue, I found a new fence had been put up, blocking the easier access I was accustomed to. But it occurred to me that the adjacent parking lot ran right alongside the river, and must surely furnish access. So, I cut across the parking lot and stepped into the bush, and was pretty much immediately at the river. I could see that the quickest approach was via the river iself; well, comporting myself in rivers in warm weather is hardly an imposition to me. I welcomed the opportunity. I set my sandals aside and stepped in; as I was in shorts and the water was little more than knee deep, the situation was ideal. Initially, I had been pestered by a few mosquitoes, and that was a concern. But it was quickly forgotten once I was actually in the river and they left me alone.

The real reward of being in the river was the view itself. I had always approached the bridge from the road course, and in fact had only ventured onto the bank beneath it once or twice. But approaching it from the river was a whole new experience. The bridge was so much more beautiful from down there. From above, it's messy, overgrown, crumbling, and perennially covered with unsightly graffiti. But from the water, it's a clean, smooth arch, moodily shadowed, pressed against the trees that hide it from all but the most persistent view. Photographed in infrared, it was positively stunning, as I hope you will agree.

I took my time, choosing my footings very carefully as I made my way upstream, carrying two cameras that between them represented over a thousand dollars. I passed under the bridge, pausing to photograph the arch in different ways, and then ventured further beyond it, towards the current Bayview Avenue bridge. Glimpsed from below its predecessor, it has its own grace and elegance, though it's nowhere near as lyric as makes one anything like wistful to view.

I went back to the old bridge and climbed up onto the deck, taking in the views I knew well from before... the overgrown bridge itself, the scene of the hillside capped by the apartments, and to the north, the little twist of road that once brought cars to Lawrence Avenue. Exactly what happened then I'm not too sure, aside from the obvious access to Lawrence easterly itself. Maps hint at other roads down there but contradict one another and I've seen little photographic evidence to make me believe there was ever much in the way of a corresponding access directly up the north side. There may have been, but I confess myself unconvinced. That the bridge itself is still visited with some frequency is obvious thanks to the copious, bland, disheartening graffiti that changes each time I'm there.

There was little there to keep me topside, so I retreated to the newer experiences down at the river's level itself. I sat beneath the bridge on the bank for a while, simply enjoying the setting, imagining its construction and what it was like for the men here then; the people who came and went across is over the years, and what Toronto was like for them. The water was warm, the day was sunny, the air was still and balmy. Surrounded by nature, at the edge of civilization, I was sitting somewhere once so much a part of who and what we were, but that was now disregarded and forgotten.

The afternoon wore on and I decided to make my way back down the river. I climbed back up the bank where I'd entered it and padded, wet, across the parking lot back to the car. Couldn't resist a couple of lighter shots; one of my footprints, and the other of me with everybody's favourite number... all that was missing from the shot to make it perfect would have been someone doing a handstand. :)

Thursday, November 01, 2007

From the folks who brought you Pearl Harbor...

Japan calls ships home, ending role in Afghan war
By Norimitsu Onishi
Published: November 1, 2007

TOKYO: The Japanese Defense Ministry ordered its naval ships home from the Indian Ocean on Thursday, ending for now a six-year mission in the war in Afghanistan that raised the nation's military presence overseas but had drawn increasing domestic criticism.

A destroyer and supply ship that had been refueling U.S. and other warships were recalled at 3 p.m., as a special law authorizing the mission was set to expire at midnight. The government of Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda was unable to renew the law because of opposition from the Democratic Party, which seized control of Parliament's upper house in a landslide victory over the summer.

The United States had urged Japan to extend the refueling mission, which, while largely symbolic, provided important diplomatic support for Washington. The mission, based on a "special antiterrorism law," constituted the pacifist country's main contribution to the Bush administration's war on terror.

"To eradicate terrorism in solidarity with the international community, our country must fulfill its responsibility by continuing the refueling mission by all means," Fukuda said in a prepared statement.

Fukuda's government has introduced a new refueling bill in Parliament and could use its control of the lower house to override any objections from the opposition. But even if the government adopted this strategy - a potentially unpopular one, given a public divided over the naval deployment - the refueling mission would not resume for several months.

The law's expiration underscored the current political deadlock in Japan. The governing Liberal Democratic Party suffered a devastating loss over the summer because of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's mishandling of bread-and-butter issues. Abe's subsequent abrupt resignation created a political vacuum that made it impossible to renew the special law before the Nov. 1 deadline.

Ichiro Ozawa, the leader of the opposition Democratic Party, has vowed to use his grip on the upper house to force Fukuda to dissolve the lower house and call a general election. Fukuda does not have to call a general election for two more years, but the opposition can effectively shut down government by blocking this Afghanistan bill and others.

Analysts predict that Fukuda may call a general election in the spring after passing the next budget, which needs only the endorsement of the more powerful lower house.

While the refueling mission has become tied up in electoral politics, the opposition's objections also reflect a deeper disagreement over Japan's foreign policy. This time, the debate has not been over whether Japan should participate in overseas missions, but how.

Ozawa, who has long advocated dispatching Japanese troops overseas in United Nations-led missions, has argued that Japan should not back the United States unilaterally. Ozawa has argued that the Afghanistan mission violated Japan's pacifist Constitution, but that Japan should send ground peacekeeping troops to Sudan or even Afghanistan as long as they are deployed under the UN umbrella.

Support for the Afghanistan mission also suffered from public opposition to the war in Iraq and its unease over the Japanese government's unwavering backing of the Bush administration.

That unease was heightened over the government's inability to refute clearly the opposition's claims that fuel intended for the war in Afghanistan had actually been diverted to Iraq. Until the opposition's recent victory, the governing party had deflected questions about the mission so that it had received relatively little attention in the media.

"This mission of the last six years is coming to an end just as we were starting discussions on its nature and significance," said Naoto Kan, the acting president of the Democratic Party.

Through August, Japan had provided more than $190 million in fuel to warships from 11 countries, with nearly 80 percent of the total going to American ships, according to the Defense Ministry.

Euge, Claudius sum! Bonus est.








CLAVDIVS

You're not the fool everyone takes you for. You put on a show to stay under the radar. Underneath your bumbling exterior, you are a shrewd and calculating person. You don't enjoy being in the spotlight, but you can take charge if absolutely neccessary. But trust no one, not even your best friend, because you never know who might betray you.

You were portrayed by Derek Jacobi.



Which I, Claudius Character are You? created by
Shiny Objects

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

It happened on Halloween

The Canadian dollar topped its record late this afternoon, just a couple of hours ago. It was worth more than it's ever been during the lifetime of anyone alive today.

---------------------------

Oct. 31 (Bloomberg) -- Canada's dollar rose to an all-time high against its U.S. counterpart as record crude oil prices and the Federal Reserve's cut in borrowing costs spurred a rally in currencies linked to commodity exports.

The difference between Canadian and U.S. benchmark interest rates was erased for the first time since March 2005 when the Fed reduced its target for overnight lending between banks by a quarter-percentage point to 4.5 percent. The U.S. dollar tumbled against more than a dozen major currencies as the Fed's cut fueled speculation that the global economy will weather an American housing slump.

"We can't call a top in the Canadian dollar,'' said Steve Butler, director of foreign exchange trading in Toronto at Scotia Capital Inc.

Canada's dollar rose 1.2 percent to $1.0604 at 4:55 p.m. in Toronto after touching $1.0617, the highest since the currency started floating in 1950. One U.S. dollar buys 94.31 Canadian cents. The Canadian currency's previous high of $1.0614 was reached in 1957.

---------------------------

TORONTO, Oct 31 (Reuters) - The Canadian dollar rose to its highest level in nearly 130 years against the U.S. dollar on Wednesday, hitting US$1.0617 as the greenback slide lower in the aftermath of a U.S. Federal reserve rate cut.

The domestic currency has rallied sharply in recent months, thanks to lofty commodity prices, a broadly weaker U.S. dollar, merger-related interest and a robust Canadian economy.

At about 4:15 p.m. (2015 GMT), each U.S. dollar was worth 94.19 Canadian cents.

Monday, October 29, 2007

Red sky at morning

The CBC reports this evening that domestic Chinese travel, Chinese people seeing China, has going from "non-existent" 20 years ago to a $60 billion dollar a year industry now. It's like I've been saying: sooner or later, China's people will necessarily grow in affluence and they'll reach a point where they stop selling goodies to us for a nickel a ton and start consuming their own production. There are 1.3 billion of them in China alone, and only 330 million of us in Anglo America and another 480 million in the EU. We're only frosting on their cake once it's finally done baking.

We better get ready for the day the oven opens.

The smaller dollar

According to the Bank of Canada, the day I started City in the Trees, May 16, 2005, the Canadian dollar was worth 79¢ US. If you had bought something worth a dollar Canadian with a US dollar that day, you would have gotten 26¢ in change (Canadian).

All my life, at least all my economically-conscious life, the Canadian dollar has been worth less than the US dollar. There've been certain advantages to it; it's tended to be good for exports because it made our commodities less expensive to everyone else (in particular, people in the US)... but it had a couple of downsides. First of all, it made it things here more expensive, and that meant that we had to live just a little meaner than our neighbours, through no fault of our own. Secondly, it was faintly humiliating. Who could forget when our dollar was worth 62¢ US just five years ago? Odds are, it will be worth less than the US dollar again, but for the moment... just for the moment... I can think back to when a friend visited from Los Angeles in the mid-90s. He came ready for every contingency implied by crossing the border; he even wanted to know if he had to bring adapters for his electrical appliances (the answer: no). But he could not be bothered, absolutely couldn't be bothered, to change one red cent US to Canadian currency. He simply took it for granted that people here would treat his money as legal tender in a foreign land; indeed, would be damn glad to have it and welcome it in preference to our own. I never said anything to him, he was a guest, but I found his attitude arrogant and insulting... and the thing is, I knew even if I had raised it as an issue, he would simply have thrown the value and international stature of his currency right in my face... he was that kind of guy, unfortunately.

(Allow me to quickly add here that of the several visitors I've had from the US since, not one has had that attitude or come without at least some Canadian money at the ready.)

Well, I've lived long enough to see my dollar raise its head above that waterline and finally take a breath. I don't know how long it'll last, but I did see it. Just a few moments ago, I noticed our dollar trading, momentarily, above $1.05 US. Today, our dollar broke the record it set against the US dollar in 1974, and is worth as much as it was in 1960: in other words, it's worth more than it's ever been worth in my entire lifetime, measured against the US dollar. And how I would have loved to have had that smug Los Angeleno with me on Saturday. I was with P-Doug and MG down at a new Chinese supermarket called T&T at the lake front. As we went through the checkout, I happened to notice pink cards they'd put up at every register, announcing they were accepting US dollars at 90¢. I couldn't help smiling as I tried to imagine his face. Damn, but that felt good.

It won't last... but just for a few moments, this is ours.

Thursday, October 25, 2007

"Make it blow"

I started renting Star Trek: The Next Generation recently, starting right at the beginning. Season 1, of course.

My God. Is it fucking awful.

The plots are dopey and unsophisticated; enemies are one-dimensional and would tip over in a stiff wind. The sycophancy of the characters towards Captain Picard is nauseating; the way they all brown-nose him, you would think the guy shits oxygen and there's no other source for lightyears. The level of exposition is oppressive; they leave nothing to the imagination and even the "hints" they drop land like skydiving elephants... of typical 'use' in this regard is Data, who has an encyclopedic knowledge of everything, except the obvious (as Tom Baker's Doctor Who once snarled to his sidekick K-9 in a famous outtake, "Yeah, you never know the fucking answer when it's important.").

But the acting... ohhhh, the fucking, pompous, wooden, over-the-top, acting. I can't believe after all these years it's still Bill Shatner who carries this albatross around his neck. Go back and watch the first season of ST:TNG and then send Bill a nice card apologizing. Kirk on his broadest day had nothing on these hams, believe me. Every scene has someone you just want to smack.

The strange thing is, I remember the show kindly. And I've seen enough of the later episodes lately to know that the style calmed down and the acting improved. Mind you, they had more than twice as long as ST:TOS to get their act together. So I'm going to keep going with the series and wait for it to start hitting the groove. But honestly, watching this shit again for the first time in about 20 years, I remember now why I hated the show when it debuted, and I'm amazed it got past its second season. Had it carried any other name, you would have heard the flush long before that.

P.S. I like Wil Wheaton (have you ever been to his blog? It's hilarious, irreverent, and down-to-earth); I first saw him in Stand By Me, and I always felt bad for him that he got saddled with a no-win roll like Wesley Crusher. Time hasn't improved the character's standing, I'm afraid; I hated him then, and I hate him now. Was "know-it-all kid" ever a popular role, in either fiction or real life? "Wesley, you need to know more about starships... come over here, have a look at the airlock..."

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

We be 3D at City In the Trees?

I mistyped the heading; I very nearly referred to my blog as something like "Coitus In the Trees". Sounds like fun, though, doesn't it? :)

In any case, in a recent posting about the construction at Sixteen Mile Creek, I mentioned that I thought it might be of interest someday for people to see what the bridge looked like, and that at least I could show them in colour. Jokingly, I lamented that 3D wasn't really an option yet.

But I started wondering about that this morning. I remember reading about things like sync systems for paired digital cameras a couple of years ago. Seemed cumbersome and impractical to me, but the idea intrigued me enough to take another look.

It turns out that some place in Asia has adapted an old idea to a new use. They've created something called 3D Lens-In-Cap. It connects directly to the body of the camera and features a beam splitter, which I understand is an old-fashioned way of generating 3D images from way back in the 19th century. The idea here is that two different elements about three or four inches apart (roughly the distance between human eyes) each provide half an image, side by side on a single exposure. In other words, instead of a single landscape image, you get two nearly identical portrait-oriented images, each occupying half the overall image. Now, of course, these are still just flat images, but between them they represent all the information needed to composite a three dimensional view. (Cross your eyes and look at this... really something.)

I imagine we're still some years yet from being able to just shoot a 3D image (though supposedly Adobe has just introduced a new method for doing so, and a rather cunning one at first blush), and we're probably a ways yet from being able to project something in three dimensions easily. But this, at least, represents the ability of recording the information now, and keeping it for when that technology exists and makes the use of it more practical. I'm thinking things like, what if I could show someone 50 years from now what Lions Valley Park looked like in three dimensions in 2007, when a whole different bridge was there? What if I could show them what places that haven't been built up yet once looked like as you walked or drove through them? What about cityscapes in Toronto that will slowly disappear as the years ago by? And all in colour. The idea really excites me.

The thing is available for the camera body I have, the Canon Rebel XT 350D (among many others), from a place in Nevada. They're asking what seems to me a very reasonable $112.50 for it. And given that the Canadian dollar is effectively at par with the US dollar (as I write this, ours is actually worth a few cents more, actually), this would seem like pretty much the ideal moment, too.

I'm really thinking about it.

ABOUT AN HOUR LATER:

Ah, screw it. Found it on eBay for about $100 US. Let's do it. :)

ABOUT TWO HOURS LATER:

Well, been to the post office, got the money order, sent it off. I mention it here because I want to record that this was the first time in my life that I paid for something in US funds for which it cost me less in Canadian. :)

The Wit and Wisdom of Robert Gates

On the prospects for homegrown democracy in Russia, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates had this to say in a recent interview with Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty:

"...it takes time to build the institutions of democracy. Just having an election doesn't mean you have a democracy. So these institutions have to grow. And you're looking at a country in Russia that in a thousand years of its history has not had a democracy. So my view is, I think we need to encourage the development of freedom in Russia, we need to encourage the development of democratic institutions, but also think we need to understand that those things take time."

Now I wonder why all that sage, practical thinking applies to the policies of his country's administration when it comes to Russia, but not when it comes to Iraq, Afghanistan, or Iran, where clearly the idea is to storm in, slap up polling booths, shove "democracy" down everyone's throat like an ipecac to induce the vomiting up of centuries of tradition, and then insist it's "mission accomplished" as you continue to dodge bullets and tiptoe through the minefields? Ah, yes, of course... because Russia has several thousand thermonuclear warheads, and those other countries don't.

Hmmm... and they say Iran is after the Bomb, is that right? Wonder why.

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Don't (with)hold your breath... withhold your money

Someone called "JS" has posted the following in response to a news story at CTV about Canadian prices remaining high despite the rise in our dollar:

"Honda, Toyota, GM, Acura, Ford, Audi and the list is growing are refusing to sell new cars to Canadians in the US. Now Quebec based Bombardier Recreational Products are refusing to sell to Canadians in the States, and that after Canadian taxpayers supported them for decades. You can still buy their products here in Canada for 40% more."

DON'T BUY
LET THEM DIE


Monday, October 22, 2007

U can't Dodge this

So Jim Flaherty, federal Minister of Finance, an elected representative of the Canadian people, can publicly beg retailers to recognize the tremendous rise in the value of the Canadian dollar over the past five years by lowering their prices and giving consumers due value for their money, and they can scarcely look up from guzzling the cream long enough to tell him to get bent…

Meanwhile, David Dodge, Governor of the Bank of Canada, the appointed head of an arm’s length Crown Corporation, nominally responsible to the government in the form of the Minister of Finance — that very same Mr. Flaherty — can muse darkly in public that the Canadian dollar has appreciated in value “abnormally quickly”, and the thing instantly plunges 1.6% in value.

Now somebody tell my why the hell this can’t work the other way around.

Thursday, October 18, 2007

Double deer blind

I crouched naked beside him in the grass on the river bank. Ten yards away, they were talking. Between them and us, hidden just this side of a fallen log, were our backpacks and our clothes. But we dared not rise and retrieve them, or even make a sound. Pressed to the forest floor, we huddled and waited.

He had first been alerted of their approach by the sudden flight of a bird. Then a voice from the river. He had urged me to drop and I did so immediately. We heard the sounds of their canoe, scraping over the rocks, and them getting out to dislodge it. Then they lingered in the pool at the river bend where we had ourselves been lounging before deciding to sun ourselves in the glade on the bank. Laughter reached our ears; the singular reek of marijuana wafted up to us. We waited, tense, fearful and excited. Curious, even. Naked, vulnerable, and exposed, praying not to be discovered, at the unknowing mercy of these people just yards away. Wishing them away; wondering who they were. Though they were our own kind, I felt more like a deer than a human.

The minutes passed with a glacial slowness, but they did pass. And so did the men, their voices seeming to break free from below us, carried off around the river bend. We rose, recovering our civility and donning it before making our way down to the very same place they had left just moments before. As we waded again in the water, we realized the rushing river in which we stood would have negated any chance of them having heard us, though from the bank we had been insulated from the water's babbling and had assumed our voices would be as clear to them as theirs to us. So we had lain there, certain that the slightest whisper risked detection; all the while the same sun that streamed down on our bare skin dappling them just a stone's throw away. But to a world of clothing and cars, talking and taxes, we had emerged from one of nakedness, fear, seclusion and silence, and all in the space of a few seconds. It was ponderous indeed how truly little there was between the one state and the other.

Friday, October 05, 2007

October 5, 1957

Fifty years ago today, the Soviet Union put the first man-made object into space and into orbit around the Earth. Sputnik, that little beeping sphere, our first "artificial moon". People, I'm told, could watch it cross the skies over their backyards, witnessing the dawn of the Space Age with their very eyes.

Yes, the Space Age is fifty years old this very day. It's hard to believe it's been that long... and harder still to believe it's only been that long. Consider this: easily within living memory, no man-made object (much less man) had ever been outside our planet's atmosphere, other than radio waves, of course. No human being had looked down and seen the Earth from pole to pole with a single glance. We had never seen a photo that showed our world hanging in the blackness of space. We were earthbound, literally.

I think it's all the more stunning to realize that we went from nothing, the day before Sputnik, to human beings walking on the Moon in less than 12 years. A baby born when Sputnik took flight would have been a kid on summer vacation waiting for grade six to start when he watched Neil Armstrong make that first track. That really WAS a giant leap when you think of it in those terms.

We've kind of let manned exploration get away from us since the early 70s. It's expensive and dangerous. Mars is a long way away. But the Moon isn't. We really ought to be making better use of our nearest neighbour by now.

But still, think of all we've accomplished in 50 years. Thousands of satellites. Human beings on the Moon. Robots we've sent to fly by, then orbit, then land on, and then wander the arid shores of other worlds. Probes to planets that we couldn't even see before the last couple of centuries, showing us their faces close up. Man-made intelligences that have plunged into the atmosphere of a moon of Saturn, wandered the trackless wastes of Mars, tickled the tails of comets. These were all things that only gods could have aspired to when people who haven't even retired yet were children. Okay, it ain't warp drive. But anyone 50 years ago would have been amazed. And so should we be.

Onward and upward.

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Mumble mumble lyrics mumble sinnnnnnngggg...

I don't understand why some bands are such assholes about their lyrics being available online, I really don't. Why is that an issue when, say, photographs of the album cover art isn't? That's publishing too. All having access to the lyrics does is augment the experience of listening to the song and really enjoying it.

The lyrics are often at the heart of a song. But modern orchestration being what it is, it's all too common for words and even whole passages to be lost in the murk of the music. I go online for clarification, but I find out that dink band #1 and greedyfuckhead band #2 and selfishtwat band #3 don't want lowly fans telling other lowly fans what they heard on the CD they just blew $22 on where they didn't deign to print the lyrics (and that is exactly the case with me today, in fact).

Stuff like this makes it a little hard for me to sympathize when someone downloads for free something the band wouldn't help you understand even if you paid them.

The party's over

I was worried when the Tories got in they'd start rolling the universe back to 1950. So far they've been pretty careful about it, but it looks like they're throwing caution to the wind now. Federal Health Minister Tony Clement has announced "the party's over." By this he means he's going to crack down on drug use. For years, decades, in fact, this country has had study after study urging the legalization and regulation of recreational substances, in much the same way we did with alcohol after its prohibition proved such a disaster. For generations now, the attitudes of average Canadians have been well in advance of the policies of their governments. Let's be blunt about it: whenever governments legislate against basic human nature, criminals get rich, and people die, needlessly. Tony Clement is a man after Al Capone's heart. What he's proposing is in the interests of almost no one in Canada, but is in the interests of every drug lord on Earth. His policy creates, sustains, and amplifies over time an environment certain to increase their profits and the likelihood and occasion for gang violence and murder, all the while needlessly taxing our system, impoverishing our nation, and ruining the lives of otherwise productive people by prosecuting something that we're otherwise entirely okay with, so long as it's done using a bottle from the LCBO. It is, in fact, a jaw-droppingly stupid, stubborn, and statist policy, and has been since before I was born.

The party's over?

The party's fired, Tony. First chance the people get.

Tuesday, October 02, 2007

A many-bridged river

I feel myself privileged to be recording a weird, small moment in "local" history. It's kind of a long story, and I record it here mostly for myself because I can't believe it will interest many, but I think it bears telling just in case it does.

About a month ago, looking at images in that imminently-useful tool, GoogleMaps, I happen to notice a second bridge on Dundas Street in Oakville that was accompanied by what was clearly a set of supports for an older, removed bridge. This was on Sixteen Mile Creek; earlier this summer I undertook visiting the set on Twelve Mile Creek and shots from that trek appear in this blog. The set at Sixteen Mile Creek consisted of, from what I could see, six tall slabs (judging from their shadows) and the concrete abutments at either end. I was, in my geeky way, delighted. It seemed there was a park at the base of the bridge (Lions Valley Park), fed by a road in from Dundas Street, and so I decided to head over there and take a look.


I went the first weekend in September... on Labour Day, if I'm not mistaken. I was surprised when I got there to find the road down to the park was closed by construction. I ended up parking in the nearby subdivision (one of those ritzy, unfriendly ones that largely bans parking on its streets and is mostly free of those encouragements to foreign interlopers called "sidewalks") and made my way to the blocked road and down into the valley.


Even on the way down, I could see something was up. Dead ahead through the screen of trees and at the bottom of the road, I could see a concrete and steel construction, filling the view. This turned out to be a new bridge support. And of the six ancient ones I had come in hopes of seeing, only two remained. Of the other four, no hint remained. I was really disappointed... I had hoped to get a few dramatic shots of the six dethroned bridge supports standing like gigantic dominos in a row. No such luck. But I was intrigued by all the new construction. A footbridge to the north of the current Dundas Street bridge was also gone; in its place, two new bridges on the south side... one clearly meant for pedestrian traffic and likely permanent; the other a bridge for construction vehicles that will probably be removed when the work is through in a couple of years.


I made my way to the west side of the creek and then up into the park. Eventually, I drifted to creek itself and waded up its course for about a quarter of a mile, and then beyond its first bend I hiked up into the forest for a while. I followed the reverse course on my return.


In the days following my trip there, I went online and tried to determine just exactly what the plan was for all the construction there. I discovered that the course of the old, long-removed bridge was about to be recovered by a three-lane eastbound bridge. I also discovered that the current four-lane Dundas Street bridge is due to be torn down, and replaced by a twin span carrying three lanes westbound. So the existing single four-lane span will be replaced by two three-lane spans over the next couple of years or so. Once the first bridge is built, I expect the existing span will begin to be torn down... and I would like to record that process. One day, a generation from now, someone like me will wonder what that bridge looked like, how it appeared in the valley (just as I do about the long-gone bridge those six dominoes once hefted across the valley). I'm hoping this entry, and some of these shots, will survive somehow to show that.

My research also uncovered a really interesting fact: down in the valley there, there had once been a small village, with something like 500 people living there at its peak in the 1850s. It was called Proudfoot's Hollow after the man who owned the mill, and it served the port of Oakville at the time. The coming of the railroad effectively killed the village, since it effectively killed that same port. By 1880, it was pretty much abandoned. It must have been something to see. Apparently there's a painting of it at the Halton Regional Archives in Milton... I intend to go see it soon.


Another interesting thing about the place, to me personally, is that it was once a migratory station for the passenger pigeon. At the time of height of the village's population, when millions of these birds would visit the place, their droppings were apparently copious enough to kill trees. Who then would have imagined that within the span of a single human lifetime, the last passenger pigeon would die, in captivity, in 1914? Would they have believed that a child who had seen the former could live to bear witness to the latter? Modern extinctions have always fascinated me, but none more so than the passenger pigeon. To reflect that where I walked, waded, hiked, had once been full of millions of these birds that probably only a bare handful of people still alive today could ever have seen — and even then, only in two or three zoos — that realization amazes me. No one living today ever saw one in the wild; the last was shot in 1900. Within a decade, we will be able to say, with full confidence, that no living person ever saw a living, breathing passenger pigeon... once the most numerous single species of bird in all the world.

I returned to the place on the last weekend of September, wondering if I would find the last two remaining supports from the 1920s bridge pulled down. They still remained. I began to wonder if they plan was to retain them for some purpose. Time will tell.

I noticed two particular differences from the last time I was there. The first was a new support beginning construction. The second was that the abutment on the west side was plainly, and quite broadly visible. It dwarfed the abutment for the 1920s bridge that juts from the valley wall just below it.

I find all this truly interesting. Everywhere you look, evidence of bridges... past, present, and future. With a casual glance, in a single image, it is easy — in fact, nearly inevitable — to glimpse all three at once. Perhaps most poignant of all to me is the knowledge that the tall, impressive span existing there today and carrying all the traffic of Dundas Street across the valley from height to height is itself doomed. By the end of the decade, probably, it will be a memory. I hope my pictures will help people, especially people in the future, to remember it. They are, at least, in colour... sorry, 3D isn't a genuinely viable option just yet. :)

Monday, October 01, 2007

Conning at the con

One of the things I did this weekend was help out a friend at an action figure expo. He's been a collector of action figures since before I met him, and his collection must have peaked at something in five figures, financially speaking. Lately, as more and more of his thirties wash over him, the collection has become less of a labour of love and more of a long-term asset to be slowly liquidated in favour of new interests (like debt elimination). So, the other day, I helped him set up and watched the money roll in.

Everyone's got a story. The place was thick with nerds (guilty), but everyone was intriguing in some way, even if it was just irritating. For example, someone was there in a dead-on Darth Vader outfit, including the breathing apparatus. It was astounding. I have to wonder... what does it cost to put something like that together? What drives someone to want to comport himself in public in it? What lurks in the soul of someone who wants to "be" Darth Vader (yes, I know we all do, deep down, but not to the point of putting on the cowl). I'm not condemning, mind you. Just curiosities that came to mind. Bravo on the outfit, though.


There was one little dude there... must have been a teenager, or maybe 20 or so... skinny as a rake and probably couldn't have lifted a book of stamps without a muscle pull, but with a nose he could have picked with an ice cream scoop — it's a wonder he could hold his head up. He came around time and again to moon over one of my friend's action figures. The figure was priced at $15, but this guy only wanted the accessories that came with the figure. I was utterly amazed at the mental block this guy seemed to have. Okay... are the accessories to complete your figure worth fifteen bucks to you? Great, here they are with a bonus figure. If not, then you're asking my buddy to bust up HIS complete figure so YOU can have one on the cheap. But I mean, this guy came back three times that I can remember, fingering the thing like it was a gold coin he wouldn't be able to afford for years to come or something. I wanted to shake him. "Hey, man, it's fifteen bucks. I know it means you risk defaulting on your mortgage or you might have to miss that RSP contribution this month, but live a little. BE GOOD TO YOURSELF!" It was hilarious. He finally pried the figure out of my friend for ten bucks. But, Jesus, we're not even talking about the difference in a cheap lunch here.

I think my favourite was the white guy in the baseball cap with hair like Predator. He was mulling over some of the vehicles my friend had for his action figures and laying this line of bullshit on us. "Oh, ten bucks, that's a little steep for something for my seven-year-old." Uh huh. My friend's brother had been by and informed us that it cost $25 for buyers just to get into the expo. But here we had a guy who had presumably spent at least that much already, using this unlikely ruse to nickel-and-dime my friend. I felt like telling him, "Hey, you know, it's FREE to get into Toys R Us. That twenty-five bucks would probably buy a few vehicles for your, ah, seven-year-old." Yeah... just not collectable ones from the late 80s and early 90s, though. We did give the guy the benefit of the doubt, though: later on, my buddy and I were joking that he really did want it for his son. Picture the scene: son reaches for jeep, only to have his hand slapped away by Dad. "DON'T TOUCH IT! I bought it for YOU! ...You'll get it when you're 50 and I'm dead!" There, see? I was wrong to doubt the man. :)

You and me against the world

I happened to visit a local mall on Saturday and felt the need to avail myself of the facilities. When I went in there, I noticed something strange. There were six urinals, but only two privacy dividers.

Very strange. Typically, urinal privacy dividers are an all-or-nothing prospect. Either you're shielded, or you're not. I don't mean to scandalize the ladies here, but generally, public washrooms spare the expense of privacy. You're just expected to keep your eyes to yourself.

So I was puzzled by this set-up. It effectively took the six urinals and divided them into three sets of open pairs (no poker pun intended here). What's the message here? It's fine for just two guys to have no secrets from each other, but God forbid you should be bothered by some guy wanting a threesome? This is a little like putting brakes on every second car.

Monday, September 24, 2007

You couldn't script this kind of irony

From today's online version of The Globe and Mail.

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Right to the Moon

Last night, a friend and I took in In the Shadow of the Moon, a newly-released documentary about the Apollo Program. It was everything I hoped for, and more. It was interesting from a technical and historical aspect... but moreover, it was deeply, deeply human.

A little background here... it's about me, but this is my blog, after all. When I was a really little boy, seven or eight, I was very interested by the planets of our solar system. These huge, distant, foreign places, so different from Earth. This was a time when space exploration (at least from a Western perspective) was being done by robots. The Pioneers and Voyagers were sending back photos of Jupiter and Saturn. The Vikings had shown us Mars close up. But no Westerner (read: American) had been in space since Skylab. It was a drought in manned space flight for the Western world. So I had little context.

At my age, I was alive for the first Moon landing, but I not old enough to remember or understand it. I vaguely remember Apollo 17, the last moonshot... not the particulars, just the event. I was four years old, and I still remember looking up at jet planes and having the impression that people went to the Moon about as regularly as they flew in planes. It just seemed that commonplace.

Fast forward nearly a decade. When I was twelve, I began to become interested in manned space flight (this was in the days just before the shuttle resumed the American presence in space on a human level). I was reaching adolescence, and human stories were beginning to appeal to me... not merely the mechanics and nifty aspect of things, but the romance, the risk, the adventure of it. So I began reading up on the history I'd lived but did not remember. I used to spend lunch hours in the school library, pouring over books and issues of National Geographic nearly as old as I was, full of pictures and names. I can still remember being amazed to discover that twelve, and only twelve, Americans had walked on the Moon, and only twice that number had ever been to it, either to its surface or in orbit. I had imagined hundreds of people had done so. Even more amazing still was the discovery, when I went looking for a list of Soviet names, that the Soviet Union had never sent any human being to, or landed a human being on, the Moon. These 24 Americans were it. Period. Full stop. The only human beings who had ever left the gravity of Earth and gone to another world.

And so they remain, to this very day. Only two dozen.

And they have begun passing. God forbid, but it must be said: one day, reasonably soon, living memories of the Moon from close up will be gone. The men (and they were all men) who visited the Moon between 1968 and 1972, in their 30s and 40s then, are in their 70s and 80s now. And that's what makes this project and ones like it so very, very fundamental to humanity. No one has been to the Moon in 35 years now. Experience, know-how, even some of the technology is lost to us. Some of it rusts away... some of it dies. Recording every nuance is so important, if we are to go back, spread out, take our destiny beyond the cradle and into our universe.

Okay... enough of that. :)

The movie is gorgeous. Humourous. Nail-biting. Moving. Directed by Ron Howard, this movie puts us face to face with a handful of the people who did the actual work of going to the Moon. The warm, honest, self-effacing wit of Mike Collins. The breathtakingly-expressed wonder of Gene Cernan. The down-to-Earth (no pun intended) humanity of Alan Bean. The approachability and openness of Jim Lovell. Buzz Aldrin's joy in the technical, Charlie Duke's memories of mundane made amazing, Harrison Schmidt's pride in the achievements of science...

I find it amazing that a movie made nearly 40 years after Apollo 11 can still make me anxious, watching Walter Cronkite remind me that an hour and twenty-nine minutes from "now", Apollo 11, seen behind him, will lift off to do something long ago accomplished, but when he spoke the words, still something we had not yet achieved. I know how it turned out; we all do... and yet, I felt that pang in the pit of my stomach. It's almost like being able to remember it.

The sadness of the Apollo 1 fire; even the shock at the ugliness of the images. The needless, but probably unforeseeable, loss of Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffe. The wondering, at the time, were they 'burying the program along with their buddies', to paraphrase.

There's a shot in the movie, taken from long distance... I'm not sure exactly how... of one of the astronauts, standing on the grey of the Moon. Beyond him isn't the blackness of space, but more grey. As the camera pulls back, you are shown immense lunar mountains beyond him; then space. He becomes a tiny presence; one of only two inhabitants of the Moon... the camera pans away to the right, taking in the vista. If your jaw doesn't drop open when you see that... you're too cynical and jaded for me.

A profound moment (one of many) comes when Mike Collins tells us of orbiting the Moon while Neil and Buzz are on the surface. On the far side, out of touch with all the rest of us, he looked down at the Moon and knew... beyond it, was all of mankind, "plus two" on the near side of the Moon. And he, alone among all our kind, was on the outside. Him, and all the rest of the universe, whatever and whoever else. And how much he exalted in that knowledge. People feel sorry for Mike Collins because he didn't walk on the Moon... but clearly, he and all the six other CSM pilots have their own unique experiences.

I'm a bit disappointed that Neil Armstrong didn't participate. He was born in 1930. One day, all too soon... twenty or thirty years from now at most... it will not be possible for anyone to ask him, "What was it like? What frightened you? What moved you? What do you remember?" I wish this project had had his participation. But a couple of the astronauts, notably Buzz Aldrin and Alan Bean, expressed sympathy with Armstrong's position. He was the first... the first of our kind to touch another world. For that to be fate of the rest of your life must be a heavy burden... each of these men has been, almost literally, elevated to the status of a Greek or Roman god among us. But that name, Neil Armstrong, is the hardest of all to live up to. His self-imposed isolation is a regrettable, but understandable, outcome of all that came before. So rather than focus on my disappointment, I choose to celebrate the great gift of hearing the words and experiences of those astronauts who did sit before the camera, tell the stories, share the memories, and make that long-ago moment of excitement and amazement accessible to people like me, who did not really share in it at the time. And for all those who will come after them.

If we don't destroy ourselves in some mindless war, it is essentially inevitable that we will return to the Moon, and probably beyond. One day, a few centuries from now, going to the Moon, living on the Moon, may become commonplace, as life for Europeans in the New World became. I hope people then will be able to watch this movie, and ones like it, and recapture the wonder of what it was like when this was not ordinary, when this was not easy or to be taken for granted, when there was an elect few — two dozen, no more — given the privilege, responsibility, and honour of representing all who will set foot on other worlds forever after. Of all our kind, they were the first, the very first. No matter how long we exist or how far we may range, that will always be true.

See In the Shadow of the Moon.

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Bang. Zoom.

Today is epochal. I don't know if most people will see it that way, but I think today, Sept. 20, 2007, is going to go down in financial and social history. This very day, we have seen some startling indicators concerning the health of the US dollar and, by extension, the economy it represents.

Today, the Canadian dollar hit parity with the US dollar. The last time that was true was November, 1976, when I was still shedding milk teeth. This is partly due to rising commodity prices, which favour our dollar since we export commodities (particularly oil), but also an indicator of the tight monetary policy the Bank of Canada has followed for many years finally paying off. It's also due to the housing melt down in the States, and other factors undermining the US dollar.

Today, the euro hit $1.40 US for the first time since its creation in 1999 and implementation in 2002. Many people were saying that this was a psychological barrier the euro had to hurdle to be taken seriously as a potential reserve currency. It would seem that the euro has arrived. If this is seen to be the case, this will put even more downward pressure on the US dollar.

Today, for the first time, Saudi Arabia has declined to lower interest rates in lockstep with the US Federal Reserve. There's speculation that this is the first step to the Saudis unpegging their currency from the US dollar, and that may ultimately signify they're preparing to abandon their support for the policy of accepting only the US dollar in payment for oil. It's Saudi Arabia who has driven that policy in OPEC for over 30 years, and what has effectively backed the US dollar ever since. If this changes and oil becomes available on the open market in a basket of currencies, the days of US dollar hegemony will truly be over. What's worse, the US currency frozen in reserve banks around the world may become liquid again, and the value of the US dollar could truly plunge if that happens.

On the surface, it looks like just a couple of little incidents... but when you look at the big picture, it was a sobering day for the US economy, and the prognosis isn't a happy one. Today may turn out to be one of those days that the world changed while we were all too busy to notice.

Monday, September 17, 2007

September Morn

My friend R-Lang visited from New England and enthusiastically agreed to pose for me in nature. Though he'd like to maintain a modicum of anonymity, he's also got just a bit of an exhibitionistic streak he was eager to indulge. These were some of the shots I took that we both agreed were among the best from the session.